Scoping the Landscape : Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Generative AI in Higher Education
Authors
-
Supriya Krishnan
Assistant Professor, Department of Personnel Management and Industrial Relations (PMIR), Raja Block, Darbhanga House, Patna University, Patna - 800 005, Bihar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-7076
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijcs/2025/v10/i4/175747Keywords:
AI Governance, AI Literacy, ethical integration, equity, Generative AI, higher Education.Publication Chronology: Paper Submission Date : July 2, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : July 10, 2025 ; Paper Acceptance Date : July 14, 2025 ; Paper Published Online : August 5, 2025
Abstract
The present scoping review synthesizes literature from 2020 to 2025 to explore the integration of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education, identifying its transformative opportunities, inherent challenges, and strategies for ethical implementation. Drawing on over 30 diverse sources, including peer-reviewed articles, institutional reports, and case studies, the review highlights GenAI’s potential to revolutionize education through personalized learning, task automation, innovative course development, and 24/7 academic support. Technologies like adaptive quizzes and virtual tutors, implemented by institutions such as Arizona State University and the University of Toronto, enhance learning experiences and expand access for students while aligning education with job market demands. However, challenges such as AI "hallucinations" causing misinformation, privacy risks, ethical concerns around cognitive autonomy, and disparities in accessibility for disabled and rural learners hinder equitable adoption. Governance strategies, including adaptive policies, human oversight, and AI literacy programs, are crucial for ensuring responsible implementation, with models from Stanford and MIT offering effective frameworks. Despite compelling evidence, gaps remain in addressing equitable access, long-term workforce implications, and consistent governance. This review provides a roadmap for stakeholders to harness the potential of GenAI while mitigating risks, with inclusive policies and AI literacy ensuring ethical and fair integration. Through the interconnection of these themes, this research lays a groundwork for further studies to bridge gaps and promote sustainable, innovative learning spaces in universities.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
[1] Y. Qian, “Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field,” TechTrends, pp. 1–16, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1.
[2] L. X. Jensen, A. Buhl, A, Sharma, and M. Bearman, “Generative AI and higher education: A review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT,” Higher Educ., vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1145–1161, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10734-024-01265-3.
[3] M. B. Faller, “AI literacy course prepares ASU students to set cultural norms new technology.” ASU News. [Online]. Available: https://news.asu.edu/20241122-arts-humanities-and-education-ai-literacy-course-prepares-asu-students-set-cultural-norms
[4] S. Murray, “Business schools ease their resistance to AI.” Financial Times. [Online]. Available: https://www.ft.com/content/daa0f68d-774a-4e5e-902c-5d6e8bf687dc
[5] R. T. Williams, “The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education,” Frontiers Educ., vol. 8, 1331607, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607.
[6] W. Holmes, K. Porayska-Pomsta, K. Holstein, E. Sutherland, T. Baker, S. B. Shum, O. C. Santos, M. T. Rodrigo, M. Cukurova, I. I. Bittencort, and K. R. Koedinger, “Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 504–526, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.
[7] L. Hughes, T. Malik, S. Dettmer, A. S. Al-Busaidi, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Reimagining higher education: Navigating the challenges of generative AI adoption,” Inf. Sys. Frontiers, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10796-025-10582-6.
[8] R. C. Sharma and S. K. Panja, “Addressing academic dishonesty in higher education: A systematic review of generative AI's impact,” Open Praxis, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 251–269, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.820.
[9] H. Arksey, and L. O'Malley, “Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework,” Int. J. Social Res. Methodology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
[10] R. Sajja, Y. Sarmet, M. Cikmaz, D. Cwiertny, and I. Demir “Artificial Intelligence-enabled intelligent assistant for personalized and adaptive learning in higher education,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.10892.
[11] A. Gobrecht, F. Tuma, M. Möller, T. Zöller, M. Zakhvatkin, A. Wuttig, H. Sommerfeldt, and S. Schütt, “Beyond human subjectivity and error: A novel AI grading system,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04323.
[12] J. Yu, K. C. Cheung, T. W. Wong, C. M. Chan, K. C. Wong, and K. Fujii, “A zero‑shot LLM framework for automatic assignment grading in higher education,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.14305.
[13] M. Connolly, “AI accessibility tools education: Empowering inclusive learning.” LearningMole. [Online]. Available: https://learningmole.com/ai-accessibility-tools-education
[14] S. Krause, A. Dalvi, and S. K. Zaidi, “Generative AI in education: Student skills and lecturer roles,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.19673.
[15] “Generative AI Advisory Committee (GAIA).” University of Michigan. [Online]. Available: https://it.umich.edu/strategy-planning/gaia
[16] I. M. García-López and L. Trujillo-Liñán, “Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: A systematic review,” Frontiers Educ., vol. 10, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938.
[17] Y. An, J. H. Yu, and S. James, “Investigating the higher education institutions' guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration,” Int. J. Educational Technol. Higher Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, 10, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3.
[18] A. Mikroyannidis, A. Ekuban, J. Kwarteng, and J. Domingue, “Best Practices for the responsible adoption of Generative AI in higher education,” Proc. vol. 114, no. 1, p. 6, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.3390/proceedings2025114006.
[19] R. DerSimonian and C. Montagnino, “Crafting thoughtful AI policy in higher education: A guide for institutional leaders.” Campus Technol. [Online]. Available: https://campustechnology.com/articles/2025/03/26/crafting-thoughtful-ai-policy-in-higher-education-a-guide-for-institutional-leaders.aspx
[20] “Teaching with GenAI learning community.” University of Michigan. [Online]. Available: https://academictechnology.umich.edu/instructional-resources/generative-ai/learning-community
[21] V.-A. Melo-López, A. Basantes-Andrade, C. B. Gudiño-Mejía, and E. Hernández-Martínez, “The impact of Artificial Intelligence on inclusive education: A systematic review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 5, 539, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15050539.
[22] K. P. Soman, “Universities reshaping education: Bridging AI training and workforce needs.” India Today. [Online]. Available: https://bestcolleges.indiatoday.in/news-detail/universities-reshaping-education-bridging-ai-training-and-workforce-needs
[23] J. Weichert and H. Eldardiry, “Educating a Responsible AI Workforce: Piloting a curricular module on AI policy in a Graduate Machine Learning course,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.07931.
[24] S. Baule, “8 core digital literacy skills for 2030.” Tech & Learning. [Online]. Available: https://www.techlearning.com/news/8-core-digital-literacy-skills-for-2030
[25] C. Yang and P. Taele, “AI for accessible education: Personalized audio-based learning for blind students,” doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.17117.
[26] C. Wu, H. Zhang, and J. M. Carroll, “AI governance in higher education: Case studies of guidance at big ten universities,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 10, Art no. 354, Oct.. 2024. [Online]. Available: 10.3390/fi16100354.
[27] “OECD AI principles overview,” OECD AI. [Online]. Available: https://oecd.ai/en/ai-principles
